Can Huawei’s intellectual community replicate the success of the intellectual community?

"Although there are still many unknowns, it is certain that Huawei’s presence in the automotive industry will become stronger and stronger."

Writing | Zhang Ruibai

Editor | Zhai Wenting

Two days before the launch of Zhijie S7, the news that Huawei split its auto business was announced. It was originally the second assignment handed over by Huawei Auto, but the independent news of Che BU shifted the focus of the outside world.

In the past four years, Huawei BU has always been at the forefront because of several core issues:

Whether Huawei builds a car or not; The executive role of Huawei’s automobile solution model dispute; The person in charge of car BU has changed several times; Most importantly, Che BU is Huawei’s only loss-making business unit, and its revenue contribution is neglected in the group.

As a result of these factors, the split car BU has been brewing for more than a year.

On November 28th, at the S7 conference of Zhijie, Yu Chengdong mentioned, "Huawei’s car business is moving towards independent operation, and investment is also introduced. Changan took the lead in cooperation, and several partners of Smart Car have also been invited. At the same time, more powerful car factories in China, such as FAW, are also welcome to participate and jointly create leading and ultimate smart car solutions. 」

Li Xiang, the ideal founder, described the move as, "A similar success story is United Electronics. Huawei is equivalent to Bosch, while SAIC is equivalent to Changan. 」

LatePost analysis shows that Huawei has injected five major businesses, including smart driving solutions, into the joint venture company, which has split the fruits of the past four years, but retained the spark of chips and clouds. The spin-off enabled Huawei to unload its asset burden and introduce external funds to share the cost. It also gives equity protection to the interests of Huawei and cooperative car companies. Huawei turns customers into shareholders and fixes the smart car selection model. The newly formed joint venture company will become the middle platform of Huawei car enterprise alliance.

A few months ago, it was very likely that Huawei’s thinking was not so clear, and the benchmark of intelligent car selection mode led by Yu Chengdong was in trouble. After the bottoming out of M7 and the launch of S7, the prototype of the ecological matrix also means concretization, which gives the car BU the confidence to split up.

From these two products, we can probably see the common characteristics and differences of the word "Jie" family, and to some extent, we can also know Huawei’s ideas and ideas about automobiles.

First, the difference between the intellectual world and the intellectual world

Although they all belong to the word "Jie" family, Wen Jie and Zhi Jie are playing different cards.

Zhijie focuses on the medium-sized pure electric car market, benchmarking Tesla. At the press conference, Yu Chengdong repeatedly compared the parameters of Zhijie and Tesla Model S, as if playing with Tesla.

For example, the space utilization rate, the OneBox design concept adopted by Zhijie S7, the space availability rate can reach 88%, while the Model S is 78.5%.

For another example, the drag coefficient of Zhijie S7 is 0.203, and Model S is slightly higher than 0.208; Regarding battery life, Zhijie S7 has a battery life of 855 kilometers, and the Model S can reach a maximum of 715km;; The power consumption per 100 kilometers is 12.4kWh for Zhijie S7 and 17.5 kWh for Model S.. In short, the intelligent S7 is superior to Tesla in all indicators.

At present, the world is positioning medium and large SUVs and taking the extended range route. (Although the M5 has been published in pure electric version before, the new M7 that sells well now only has an extended range version. As we all know, the opponent that the world has found for itself is also the head of the industry-ideal.

From the beginning, the world of inquiry has been competing with the ideal dark poke. LatePost reported later that Yu Chengdong’s product project in M7 required, "We want what Li ONE has. 」

You can understand that this is a kind of learning imitation, but it is more of an afternoon, so the ideal can’t be ignored or underestimated.

Li Xiang called directly in Weibo in June this year, but was beaten by the critics last year. At the ideal strategy meeting before the National Day, the ideal high-level officials sent a high-pressure signal, "making some people who didn’t understand Huawei and didn’t value Huawei nervous."

Apart from the differences in positioning and benchmarking, the configurations of the boundary and the intellectual boundary are also different.

Although they are all Huawei’s technical solutions, Zhijie S7 is equipped with the latest version of HarmonyOS Cockpit 4.0, while the two models in Wenjie are version 3.0. The difference between the two versions lies in the upgrade of functions. The later version 4.0 is obviously smarter, including the 3D car control desktop and the Ark engine. At the same time, it is equipped with the AI capability of Pangu model, which makes the car’s small art smarter, such as intelligently recommending gas stations.

As for the intelligent driving system, Zhijie S7, like Wenjie New M7, is a HUAWEI ADS 2.0 advanced intelligent driving assistance system. The difference is that Zhijie S7 is equipped with Huawei’s self-developed 192-line lidar, which comes from a third-party supplier.

In addition, Zhijie also applied two first technologies of Huawei:

First, no one is parking service. In Yu Chengdong’s words, "I can drive, but I can stop". At the press conference, Zhijie S7 appeared in a driverless way.

Second, Zhijie was first equipped with a Turing smart chassis. There are many advantages behind all kinds of complex nouns: you can perceive roadblocks 150m in advance; When sensing bumpy roads, intelligently adjust CDC damping, improve vibration filtering, and reduce the impact by 15%.

It is not known whether these two launching technologies are specially customized for the car models of Zhijie, or whether Zhijie just caught up with Huawei’s development progress. Xinbei daybreak asked Huawei’s intellectual circles about this issue, but did not get a corresponding reply.

Second, the intellectual world is the same as the intellectual world.

Both the intellectual world and the intellectual world are the products of Huawei’s intelligent car selection model.

On the basis of providing smart car solutions, Huawei and car companies jointly develop models and deeply participate in product definition, styling design, marketing and user experience.

In other words, Huawei has a great say in what cars to build and how to sell them.

The direct performance is that the current two models of Zhijie S7 and Wenjie are equipped with Huawei’s HarmonyOS cockpit and advanced intelligent driving system. The appearance of the two brands follows Huawei’s consistent design language, which is simple and pure. At the same time, the two brands share Huawei’s sales network, and they can order in Huawei Mall, Huawei stores or authorized stores.

The most important thing that Cyrus and Chery have in common is that both car companies have actively entered the new energy industry, and they have not improved much.

In 2016, Cyrus, then a well-off stock, landed in A-shares and spent 30 million US dollars to set up a new energy automobile brand "SF MOTORS Company". Through the acquisition of overseas mature assets, it gradually accumulated three-power technology, but the road to commercialization was blocked.

In 2020, the first electric vehicle "Sailis SF5" was delivered, and only 732 vehicles were sold in the whole year. Xiaokang shares lost a total of 2.234 billion yuan that year.

Chery competes for Lisi to enter the new energy even earlier. In April 2010, Chery New Energy Automobile Company was established. But sales didn’t pick up until last year. Yin Tongyue Yin Tongyue, the former chairman of Chery, said with emotion: "Chery got up early in the new energy vehicles and caught a late gathering. 」

From January to October 2022, the cumulative sales volume of Chery’s new energy vehicles reached 207,000, up 182% year-on-year. Bao Siyu, general manager of Chery New Energy, is full of confidence: "Chery’s new energy sales have ranked third in China and ninth in the world. Our goal is to be the first in the boutique smart car. 」

Thanks to two explosive models, Chery Ant broke through 300,000 sales in October last year, and Chery QQ ice cream broke through 110,000 sales within one year of listing.

Unfortunately, the good times didn’t last long. From January to September, 2023, the cumulative insured amount of Chery’s new energy vehicles was 71,200, which was 47.59% lower than that of last year’s 135,900 vehicles, almost equal to the waist, and the situation was not very good.

Therefore, in the face of Huawei’s cooperation olive branch, the two car companies did not hesitate to accept it, and were willing to highly cooperate with Huawei’s strategic cooperation demands. Except for manufacturing, almost all other links are led by Huawei.

Even the top leaders of the two car companies showed more learning attitude towards Huawei.

Zhang Xinghai, the chairman of Cyrus, once compiled a Basic Law for the Development of a Well-off Society in an internal organization. The reference object was the Basic Law of Huawei, and the author was the same person.

Yin Tongyue even bluntly said, "Huawei has a lot to learn. You can’t learn the truth by buying books and going to college. Only by working side by side with Huawei can you learn the truth of Huawei. According to auto business review, Chery’s Eta Ursae Majoris Lab was inspired by Huawei’s 2012 Lab.

Third, HarmonyOS Zhixing Ecology

If we say that the M7 is the symbol of Huawei BU coming back to life, the S7 is the second verification of the success of Yu Chengdong’s intelligent selection model.

At the pre-release conference of Zhijie S7, Yu Chengdong began to use a lot of space to talk about Huawei’s technology empowerment, and gave the smart selection model a brand-new name, HarmonyOS Zhixing.

Yu Chengdong said, "This model is to help car manufacturers build products that consumers really love and trust and have a good user experience, so as to obtain a high NPS value (net recommended value). 」

Input with a unified logo can avoid the internal friction of various brands and strengthen the recognition of consumers. This change has been implemented by concrete actions. At the recent Guangzhou Auto Show, Wen Jie and Zhi Jie were exhibited in the same booth, and the logo of HarmonyOS Zhixing was hung in the center.

At the same time, it also means that under the principle of not building a car, Huawei is deeply involved in key links such as industrial design, all solutions and sales, which is infinitely close to building a car by itself.

According to the interface news report, in the cooperation with Huawei, Cyrus has ceded enough power. Huawei can participate in the supply chain and even decide on the reorganization and selection of core suppliers in traditional parts such as interior and exterior trim, body system and chassis system that Huawei has not set foot in.

In addition to Cyrus and Chery, HarmonyOS Zhixing camp also includes Jianghuai and BAIC, which are also named after the "X boundary". As Yu Chengdong said, the products of various car companies do not conflict. Some make SUVs, some cars and some make MPVs, but they can be combined to work together.

With the launch of follow-up products, it will be possible for Huawei to build a product matrix covering all kinds of vehicles, so as to compete with competitors, and the scale effect will also dilute the cost to ensure the continuous hematopoietic capacity and long-term development of this model.

In December last year, Yu Chengdong bluntly stated that Huawei BU was Huawei’s only loss-making business, with an annual R&D investment of more than 10 billion yuan. In the first half of 2023, the revenue of Huawei’s smart car business was 1 billion yuan, accounting for less than three thousandths of the group’s total. And set the goal of making Huawei BU profitable in 2025.

Considering from reality, this goal is still arduous. Huawei needs to speed up the pace, take Cyrus as a benchmark, invite more car companies to join and build more cars.

On November 26th, BU, Huawei’s smart car solution, was split into an independent subsidiary, and at most 40% of its equity was released for external financing.

Changan Automobile announced that it had signed the Memorandum of Investment Cooperation with Huawei. Cyrus subsequently announced that it had received an investment invitation from Huawei’s new company.

Yu Chengdong said at the press conference, "Several partners of Smart Car have also been invited, and at the same time, more powerful car factories in China, such as FAW, are also welcome to participate and jointly create leading and ultimate smart car solutions. 」

This may be Huawei’s first move to speed up the pace. Although there are still many unknowns, it is certain that Huawei’s presence in the automotive industry will become stronger and stronger.

Tik Tok Female online celebrity Rankings 2018 The most famous Tik Tok female anchor rankings.

  Tik Tok is a video app that many people like to play nowadays. You should know that there are a lot of female online celebrity on Tik Tok, and their values are exploding. Every day, many single dog kneels down on these Tik Tok goddesses. Let’s take a look at the list of Tik Tok female online celebrity. How many do you know?

Tik Tok Women’s online celebrity Rankings 2018

1. Wu Jiayu

  Wu Jiayu is one of the most popular goddesses in Tik Tok. Her videos are basically dances. There are many people who can sing and dance well in Tik Tok, and she can stand out from the homogenization content and become one of the top ten online celebrity in Tik Tok. Wu Jiayu relies on special shooting techniques. From the subway station to the street, from the bedroom to the living room, the videos are very rhythmic and bring more visual stimulation to users.

2. fox is rigorous

  Fox was originally a model with a professional background, but I believe no one had heard of her before Tik Tok appeared. And her real popularity on the Internet is on Tik Tok. Some time ago, some negative news about her came out, such as indecent photos, but she still has a large number of fans on Tik Tok. In addition, fox has a very domineering name, which is called the first beautiful goddess in Tik Tok, and runs its own clothing brand Taobao shop offline.

3. Keiko ssica

  Keiko ssica is also a very famous dance goddess in Tik Tok, and she dances very well. I believe many netizens on Tik Tok have seen the video of Miss Keiko. Miss Keiko looks sweet, her big white legs are very beautiful, her dance is superb, and her smile is particularly charming. Every video of her brings youth and vitality, which makes people feel very comfortable.

4. Tik Tok is gentle.

  Speaking of Wen Wan, I believe many people have heard that this young lady was very popular at the beginning. She became popular all over the country overnight and was later banned. This new goddess of Tik Tok, who became popular overnight, is gentle, and many people got to know her after being screened by her overnight. However, there are many people who are popular. Only after a period of popularity, the new goddess was banned because of various negatives.

5. Brother Li

  Tik Tok Lige became popular because of a song called "Let You Be My Eyes". Just like this video, the cumulative praise is close to 20 million, which makes Li Ge rise by tens of millions. With a sweet smile and a unique voice, the number of fans is now more than 39 million, nearly 40 million, but it was later banned because of the national anthem.

6. Qu Yiting

  Qu Yiting is a well-known long leg in Tik Tok, and fans tease his legs for years. Qu Yiting heard that she is particularly low-key, but she has a pair of legs that can hold up a two-meter gas field. It’s the kind of thin, white, straight legs that I’ve ordered in my last life. Dancing is also very good, and the face value is also very high, which is really enviable! Dance with passion, changeable temptation, and play with legs for years.

7. Zhang Tianyun

  Zhang Tianyun believes that many otaku will like it because she is a very sweet girl. Otakus watch her videos many times every day, and even the mobile phone screensaver is all her. Xiaoxiao’s posting in Tik Tok has set off an upsurge that my husband wants to hug me. Because of wearing a rainbow sweater, Xiaoxiao’s recognition of sending a few shaking videos can be said to be very high.

8. Jiaxin

  Tik Tok Jiaxin can be said to be a strange man. With the help of "Hum, I will know all the time whether to accompany me to sleep!"! What, are you going to play for a while? No! " "Roll", and has a lovely appearance and a voice that attracts a lot of popularity!

9. Brother M

  Brother M’s popularity mainly depends on her unique voice, that is, her smoky voice with the same style as Zhou Xun. Brother M doesn’t have much advantage in face value, and his face is a little chubby, but Miss Jie’s singing skills are really invincible. With her unique voice and singing skills, Brother M also has tens of millions of fans on Tik Tok, many of whom are true love fans. Every time I listen to my little sister’s song, people have to love it.

10. Erdou

  In Tik Tok, Erdou is a very special female online celebrity. Because, she became popular not by herself, but by adoration. She had little experience in shooting short videos before she became popular. Later, without relying on facial features or jokes, Meng Chong became a figure in the popularity list of online celebrity, Tik Tok, and people had to sigh the strong attraction of Meng Chong.

Original title: Tik Tok Women’s online celebrity Rankings 2018 How many of the most famous Tik Tok female anchors do you know?
Editor in charge: Ke Jinding

Anti-monopoly breaks the ills of big data "killing"

  On December 17th, "Big Data Killing" was searched by Weibo again, this time the protagonist was Meituan. Taxi software takes different pricing for the same customers, and booking hotel members costs more than ordinary users … … In recent years, "big data killing" has been frequently searched. Experts pointed out that the Anti-monopoly Guide on Platform Economy (Draft for Comment) (hereinafter referred to as the Anti-monopoly Guide) refines the provisions of the Anti-monopoly Law regulating Internet violations and promotes the platform to better assume social responsibilities. In order to eradicate the chaos of "big data killing", it is essential to improve laws and regulations and strengthen law enforcement, and urge enterprises to be honest and self-disciplined.

  "Big data killing" frequency hot search

  On December 17th, an article titled "I was cut by a member of Meituan" was screened on social media. Based on his own experience of ordering takeout, the author found that in the same store on Meituan, with the same delivery address and at the same time, the delivery fee for members was higher than that for non-members. According to the article, it was thought that opening take-away members would save money, but the delivery fee of almost all take-away merchants nearby was higher than that of non-members from 1 yuan to 5 yuan.

  At that time, "Meituan was killed by explosion" and quickly boarded the hot search list of Weibo on that day. Netizens complained in Weibo, Zhihu, black cats, friends circle, etc. about the differential treatment of old members by Meituan: the delivery fee is higher, the price increases after eating in the same store for two or three times, the full amount of membership is reduced after opening, and even the renewal of membership fee has felt that Meituan’s "likes the new and hates the old". Moreover, this is not only the case with the US Mission, but also the above problems when you are hungry.

  Later, Meituan’s take-out issued a statement in response, saying that the difference in delivery fee has nothing to do with membership. Because of the positioning cache in the software, the user’s last historical positioning was wrongly used, which deviated from the user’s actual position, resulting in inaccurate estimation of delivery fee. When placing an order, it will be calculated according to the real delivery address and will not be affected.

  The reporter learned that consumers’ complaints about "big data killing" are not just on the takeaway platform. During the "double 11" this year, Ms. Han, a Beijing consumer, found that she booked a hotel through an App, and the price difference was about 1000 yuan.

  On September 15th, CCTV named the phenomenon of "big data killing" on the online travel platform, and mentioned that the online travel platform set differentiated prices for the same product or service under the same conditions for tourists with different consumption characteristics. On the same day, a poll conducted on the Weibo showed that 15,000 people thought they had encountered obvious price differences, accounting for nearly 80% of all voters.

  In March 2019, the survey results of "Big Data Killing" released by Beijing Consumers Association showed that 88.32% of the respondents thought that "Big Data Killing" was common or very common, and 56.92% of the respondents said that they had been killed by "Big Data". At the same time, respondents believe that online shopping platforms, online travel and online car rides have the most problems in consumer "big data killing", and online travel ranks first.

  On December 20, 2018, "Big Data Killing" was elected as the top ten buzzwords in social life in 2018.

  … …

  In addition, similar "killing" phenomena have appeared on many platforms such as air tickets and movies.

  "Big data killing" needs to be standardized

  Nowadays, big data algorithms are becoming more and more advanced, and information customization can meet people’s diversified and personalized needs. Liu Peng, an expert in the field of big data and artificial intelligence, said that the Internet platform can accurately portray netizens by collecting social data and behavioral data, thus reducing the cost of users’ access to information, improving the quality of service to users and adding convenience to life.

  According to Wang Wei, director of the Information Security Department of Beijing Jiaotong University, "killing big data" is not technically difficult. He pointed out that after mastering personal information, behavior habits and other data, the platform judges its preferences, user adhesion, price sensitivity, etc., and uses big data technology to achieve "thousands of people", so that different prices or search results seen by different users can be "killed".

  Shen Hao, a professor at the Big Data Research Center of Communication University of China, has the same view. He further pointed out that the Internet platform can easily judge whether it is a "stranger" or a "regular customer" through the amount of user data and the frequency of data updates. As a result, the platform makes a lot of money, the interests of merchants and consumers are damaged, and it is easy to lead to monopoly.

  Shen Hao introduced that generally speaking, there are two "kill-cooked" routines of the platform: one is to raise prices for users who are not sensitive to prices, and the other is to cultivate old users to develop consumption habits and reduce preferential treatment for old users, that is, to "treat new users better than old users". The "new users" here refer not only to newly registered users, but also to users who have stopped using them for a period of time and then returned.

  From the legislative practice of European and American countries, once the behaviors such as "killing big data" are identified as unfair behaviors such as price discrimination, they will be strictly prohibited.

  In 1914, the United States promulgated the Clayton Act, which clarified the impermissible practices such as price discrimination, exclusive transactions, and mergers and acquisitions that would seriously weaken competition. Amazon was exposed to differential pricing in 2000, and the prices displayed before and after users deleted cookie data were different. Amazon CEO Bezos apologized afterwards and said that all this was just an "experiment."

  In May 2018, the EU General Data Protection Regulation came into effect, and the rights of Internet organizations to freely collect, analyze and manage user information will be strictly limited and regulated. On December 15, 2020, the European Union promulgated the draft Digital Market Law. Hong Yanqing, a senior researcher at the Peking University Institute of Rule of Law and Development, said that the explanatory memorandum of the draft pointed out that a few large platforms are increasingly serving as portals or "gatekeepers" between enterprise users and end users. These "gatekeepers" have substantial control over the access to the digital market, which leads many enterprise users to have greater dependence on these "gatekeepers" and in some cases lead to unfair behavior towards enterprise users. Article 55 of the draft clearly requires the gatekeeper to use data: in order to ensure that enterprise users can obtain relevant data, the gatekeeper should allow them to obtain data free of charge without hindrance according to the requirements of enterprise users, and should also allow the third party contracted by enterprise users to access these data. The "gatekeeper" should also facilitate real-time access to these data through appropriate technical measures.

  At present, there are laws such as E-commerce Law and Consumer Protection Law that regulate the "big data killing" behavior in China, but in fact, consumers often face the problem of proof when they encounter "big data killing".

  In 2019, when the Beijing Consumers Association released the survey results of "Big Data Killing", it pointed out that operators usually defend themselves on the grounds of product model or configuration, enjoying package discounts, and different time points, and do not disclose specific algorithms, rules and data. On the contrary, consumer rights protection is often in a difficult position to prove. The reporter inquired about the referee’s document network and found that some consumers had sued a take-away platform to the court on the grounds of "big data killing", but because of the difficulty of proof, both the first instance and the second instance lost.

  Anti-monopoly has a bright sword for "killing big data"

  In this context, the Anti-monopoly Law (Revised Draft) that has been completed and the Anti-monopoly Guide that has just finished soliciting opinions bear the expectations of all sectors of society.

  Zhai Wei, executive director of the Competition Law Research Center of East China University of Political Science and Law, pointed out that the Anti-Monopoly Guide refines the relevant provisions of the Anti-Monopoly Law regulating the Internet platform. Article 17 of the guide clearly points out that operators in the market-dominant platform economy may implement differential transaction prices or other trading conditions, new and old trading counterparts, differential standards, rules and algorithms, and differential payment conditions and trading methods based on big data and algorithms, according to the payment ability, consumption preferences and usage habits of the trading counterparts.

  At the same time, the Anti-Monopoly Law (Revised Draft) clarifies four possible legitimate reasons for operators in the field of platform economy to implement differential treatment, namely, to implement different trading conditions according to the actual needs of the trading counterparts and in line with legitimate trading habits and industry practices, to carry out preferential activities for the first transaction of new users within a reasonable period of time, to carry out random transactions based on the rules of fairness, reasonableness and non-discrimination on the platform, and other reasons that can prove the legitimacy of the behavior.

  Associate Professor Zhong Gang, executive director of the Competition Law Research Center of East China University of Political Science and Law, further explained that the clear justification is not to give the merchants an opportunity, but to follow the market logic and maintain the normal profit space of the merchants. According to Zhong Gang, judging whether "big data killing" is established in legal procedures will also give both parties the same right of proof.

  Enterprises should attach importance to anti-monopoly compliance

  The strong scale effect and network effect of the Internet industry itself are inherently exclusive to competition. Xiong Hongru, an associate researcher in the Innovation and Development Research Department of the State Council Development Research Center, pointed out that "the big is not a problem, but the big bullying the small, algorithm collusion and even governance risks within the platform".

  "The Anti-Monopoly Law protects the interests of consumers." Zhang Dezhi, director of the Consumer Supervision Department of the China Consumers Association, said, "I hope that after the revision of the Anti-Monopoly Law and the promulgation of the Anti-Monopoly Guide, it will be reloaded to help create a business atmosphere of fair competition and let consumers become real beneficiaries."

  Yu Zuo, Secretary-General of the Competition Policy Committee of China Institute of Industrial Economics, pointed out that monopoly enterprises abuse their dominant market position and set unreasonable high prices, which will definitely damage the interests of consumers in the end. It is expected that in the future, law enforcement departments will strengthen law enforcement in accordance with the revised Anti-Monopoly Law and the Anti-Monopoly Guide, and strictly investigate behaviors such as "big data killing" involving price discrimination and abuse of market dominance, so as to make the market compete fairly, improve product quality and benefit consumers.

  "The life of law lies in its implementation. Administration according to law is the key link of law implementation, and consciously abiding by the law is an important condition for law implementation. " Zhong Chun, an associate professor at Jinan University Law School, said that Internet companies are not short of professional knowledge or professionals, and they should strive to comply with regulatory requirements in anti-monopoly compliance in the future.

  With the increasing attention of the regulatory authorities and the maturity of the market, the domestic anti-monopoly laws and regulations and the level of law enforcement will be improved and improved rapidly. Lv Laiming, a professor at the Law School of Beijing Technology and Business University and vice president of the Beijing E-commerce Law Research Association, suggested that "fines are not the only way. When enforcing the law or supervising, administrative supervision departments can also take interviews and guidance to further urge them to rectify according to law."

  To solve the chaos of "big data killing", in addition to improving laws and regulations and strengthening law enforcement, it is more important for enterprises to abide by the law, be honest and self-disciplined.

  "Internet platform enterprises should strictly abide by anti-monopoly laws and regulations and maintain fair competition in the market." When answering a reporter’s question, the relevant person in charge of the Anti-monopoly Bureau of the General Administration of Market Supervision suggested that enterprises should sort out their own business practices in accordance with the provisions of the Anti-monopoly Law and not engage in monopolistic behaviors prohibited by the Anti-monopoly Law. At the same time, respect the law, abide by the law, and effectively strengthen anti-monopoly compliance management in accordance with the requirements of the Anti-monopoly Compliance Guide for Operators.

  Xue Jun, director of Peking University E-commerce Law Research Center, suggested that enterprises should establish a socialized appraisal mechanism according to the application scenarios of the algorithm and its impact on citizens’ basic rights and interests, so as to avoid the possible antitrust consequences of the algorithm.

  Only when laws and regulations are "long teeth", supervision plays an anti-monopoly combination boxing, and enterprises are promoted to self-discipline and social co-governance, can we get rid of the stubborn disease of "killing big data", change "killing" into "familiarity" and turn "first-time customers" into "repeat customers".